Sr. Engineer, Process Development & Implementation - Dry Premium
Core
Leading the development and deployment of new technology and innovation projects for pet food product formats (Cat and Dog) across pilot plant and factory scales.
Role type
Senior IC process development engineer (food manufacturing)
Builds
Scalable process specifications, pilot plant equipment, and factory-scale technology platforms for pet food products
Domain
Food manufacturing / Pet food industry
Deliverable
production ML models | product features | dashboards & analysis | research | client delivery | infrastructure | physical/clinical work -> physical/clinical work (Note: Corrected to 'physical/clinical work' based on the allowed list, but the actual deliverable is physical prototypes and process specs. The allowed list is rigid. Let's map 'physical prototypes' and 'process specs' to the closest fit or omit if none fit perfectly. The list has 'product features' and 'infrastructure'. 'Physical prototypes' fits 'product features' loosely? No. 'Infrastructure' fits 'factory scale equipment'. Let's stick to the most accurate: 'product features' for the process specs and 'infrastructure' for the equipment. Actually, the prompt says 'one of: ...'. I will choose 'product features' for the process specs and 'infrastructure' for the equipment, but since I can only pick one, I will prioritize the core output which is the process/specs. Wait, the instruction says 'one of'. I must pick one. The role builds 'scalable process specifications' and 'factory scale-able equipment'. 'Infrastructure' is the best fit for the equipment and 'product features' for the specs. I will select 'product features' as the primary output of the R&D work, or 'infrastructure' for the plant side. Let's look at the list again: 'production ML models | product features | dashboards & analysis | research | client delivery | infrastructure | physical/clinical work'. The role builds 'scalable process specifications' and 'factory scale-able equipment'. 'Infrastructure' is the best fit for the equipment and plant scale. 'Product features' is also valid for the specs. I will use 'product features' as the primary deliverable of the R&D process development.